|
Shabbat Parashat Vayeilech 5783P'ninat Mishpat: Selling a Car with Flaws(based on ruling 82053 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts)Case: The plaintiff (=pl) bought a seven-seat used car from the defendant (=def). At the time of the sale, def told pl about problems with the gears system but not other problems. After pl used it for a while, he discovered that the car stalls. Pl demands that def pay for repairs, while def counters that he told pl about all of the problems. Ruling: The definition of the blemishes that impact a sale depends on that which is accepted in a given time and place (Rambam, Mechira 15:5; Shulchan Aruch, Choshen Mishpat 232:6). Even when a seller provides a blemished sales item without being aware of it, the buyer can demand that the sale be voided (Chulin 51a). When it is unclear whether the blemish existed at the time of the sale, we apply the rule that the one in possession of the money in question gets to keep it (Shulchan Aruch, Choshen Mishpat 232:16). These rules could be affected by the presence of a written agreement, but there was none in this case. Even when there are grounds for nullifying a sale due to blemishes, the buyer cannot do so if he was aware of the blemish when he bought it or when he used the object after becoming aware of the blemish (Shulchan Aruch, Choshen Mishpat 232:7). However, if he checked the object but did not find the blemishes, he can make a claim upon finding out about them. When there is a possibility to fix the blemishes without having a major impact on the nature of the sale, the seller has the right to make that repair and salvage the sale (ibid. 5). Regarding a case where the basic sale is workable, and the buyer wants to preserve the sale but demands compensation to enable repair of the blemishes, there is a machloket among Acharonim on the matter (see ruling 74031 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit beit din network). It is logical that it is not possible to make such a claim when the price of repair does not make sense according to the value of the object. Then, the buyer has to choose between backing out of the sale and keeping the object as is. In this case, we conclude that def informed pl about the problem with the gears but not about the engine trouble that causes stalling. We therefore obligate def to pay for repairs of the latter, as the repairs are modest in comparison to the price of the car. While the problems with the gears are now greater than described originally, it is possible that this deterioration happened after the sale, and so we will not obligate def for that. Top of page
Print this page
Send to friend
|
We daven for a complete and speedy refuah for: Nir Rephael ben Rachel Bracha Arye Yitzchak ben Geula Miriam Neta bat Malka Meira bat Esther Together with all cholei Yisrael Hemdat Yamim is dedicated to the memory of: for our homeland Rav Shlomo Merzel z”l
Mr. Shmuel & Esther Shemesh z"l Sivan 17 / Av 20 Mr. Moshe Wasserzug z"l Tishrei 20 ,5781 R' Eliyahu Carmel z"l Rav Carmel's father Iyar 8 ,5776 Mrs. Sara Wengrowsky bat R’ Moshe Zev a”h. Tamuz 10 ,5774 Rav Asher & Susan Wasserteil z"l R' Meir ben Yechezkel Shraga Brachfeld z"l & Mrs. Sara Brachfeld z"l Tevet 16 ,5780 R 'Yaakov ben Abraham & Aisha and Chana bat Yaish & Simcha Sebbag, z"l Rav Yisrael Rozen z"l Rav Benzion Grossman z"l R' Abraham Klein z"l Iyar 18 ,5779 & Mrs. Gita Klein z"l Av 4 Rav Moshe Zvi (Milton) Polin z"l R' Yitzchak Zev Tarshansky z"l Adar 28, 5781 Nina Moinester z"l Nechama Osna bat Yitzhak Aharon & Doba Av 30, 5781 Rabbi Dr. Jerry Hochbaum z"l Adar II 17, 5782 Mrs. Julia Koschitzky z"l Adar II 18, 5782 Mrs. Leah Meyer z"l Nisan 27, 5782 Hemdat Yamim |