|
Shabbat Parashat Bamidbar| 5770P’ninat Mishpat: Status of Child of Woman Who Had Civil Marriage(ps’ak of Harav Shaul Yisraeli- condensed from Mishpatei Shual, siman 22) Case: A Jewish man and woman got married as refugees in a far-flung camp in the Ruling: There is limited evidence that the couple of refugees might have been married in a manner that has halachic significance. First, there is a Russian government document that says that they got married. However, at those times, rabbis or knowledgeable Jews were scarcely found in that area ( There is a major halachic discussion if a couple that publicly lives together after a civil marriage is considered married by virtue of living together. The consensus of poskim (Rav Ch. O. Grodzensky and others) is that a get is not necessary if she has great difficulty getting one, and this is the standard approach in the Israeli batei din. This is based on the Rivash’s responsum regarding concealed Jews who married in front of priests, which he sees as an indication that they were not interested in a halachic marriage. The Terumat Hadeshen says similarly, and this is the ruling of the Shulchan Aruch (Even Haezer 148:6) and the Rama (ibid. 26:1). Only when there is an assumption among acquaintances that a couple had a Jewish wedding was the D’var Avraham stringent, which is not the case here. The personal status of the woman’s daughter (fear of mamzerut) is no less of a need (allowing us to consider the marriage void, as we believe) than the situation of a woman having difficulty with a get, and thus she should be permitted. Top of page
Print this page
Send to friend
|
More articles from this issue: This week’s Hemdat Yamim is dedicated in loving memory of R' Meir ben
|