![]() |
![]() Shabbat Parashat Chukat 5783P'ninat Mishpat: Extent of Partnership – part II(based on ruling 81096 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts)Case: In 2007, a land developer (=def1) planned a project – he would buy a property with a two-story building and greatly expand the building. The plaintiff (=pl) put up 900,000 NIS and received a 10% stake in profits from the project. There is a long agreement between the sides (=agr) and, later, a letter of understanding. Def2 and def3 are close relatives of def1, and there is another investor (=adinv). After the purchase of the property, the Tabu (Land Registry) listed four owners of 25% of the property each – pl, def2, def3, and adinv. After a later sale, officially by these four, to another six people (who bought apartments), pl’s stake, per Tabu, stands at 13.5%. Pl received one of the apartments and demands additional money as per his 10% stake, including rent on the apartments that def1 handles. Pl claims that his 10% ownership enables him to receive both an apartment, like the others, and also general rights. Def claim that pl did not receive 10% ownership of the property but, as an investor, 10% of the profits, from which the value of the apartment he received should be subtracted. Def demand of pl that he sign a request for a building permit for the second stage of the building’s expansion. Ruling: [Last time, we saw that financial logic, the language of the agreement and an admission of pl in a different beit din all indicate that pl did not own 10% of the property but only has claims to 10% of profit.] In general, legally and halachically, entry of ownership in the Tabu is very significant, and in this case, it seems to support pl. However, there are problems with the support it gives. Pl admits that he never had more than 10% rights, yet the Tabu had him at 25%, and now at 13.5%. Thus, the Tabu is not an accurate indication. Def1 does not appear in it at all, and yet all agree that he is the main owner and that the Tabu was done as it was for technical reasons (the sides preferred not to discuss details). Arguably, pl has a migo (proof of telling the truth from the fact that he could have won with a claim that he admits is not true). In a case where the thing he wants to rely upon is invalid (the Tabu, in regard to this case), we have an indication from the gemara (Bava Batra 32b) that migo does not help. Our beit din has ruled in the past that when an entry in Tabu can be demonstrated to be incorrect, the Tabu is to be fixed rather than being able to validate that which is not true. The other official papers that state that pl is a 13.5% owner are just extensions of the Tabu entry. Agr states that pl is to cooperate with requests for building permits, and based on the timing of the letter of understanding, it clearly applies to stage 2 of expansion as well. While an obligation to do something is not generally halachically binding, since def1 relied on the promise, pl would at least be obligated to pay for damages stemming from his refusal. Furthermore, in our times, an obligation to go along with a building practice can be binding based on dina d’malchuta (the Law of Contracts) and accepted practice. Therefore, pl is to cooperate with the process or face sanctions from beit din. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() We daven for a complete and speedy refuah for: Nir Rephael ben Rachel Bracha Arye Yitzchak ben Geula Miriam Neta bat Malka Meira bat Esther Together with all cholei Yisrael
to the memory of: for our homeland Prof. Yisrael Aharoni z"l Kislev 14, 5783 Rav Shlomo Merzel z”l
Mr. Shmuel & Esther Shemesh z"l Sivan 17 / Av 20 Mr. Moshe Wasserzug z"l Tishrei 20 ,5781 R' Eliyahu Carmel z"l Rav Carmel's father Iyar 8 ,5776 Mrs. Sara Wengrowsky bat R’ Moshe Zev a”h. Tamuz 10 ,5774 Rav Asher & Susan Wasserteil z"l R' Meir ben Yechezkel Shraga Brachfeld z"l & Mrs. Sara Brachfeld z"l Tevet 16 ,5780 R 'Yaakov ben Abraham & Aisha and Chana bat Yaish & Simcha Sebbag, z"l Rav Yisrael Rozen z"l Rav Benzion Grossman z"l R' Abraham & Gita Klein z"l Iyar 18, /5779Av 4 Rav Moshe Zvi (Milton) Polin z"l R' Yitzchak Zev Tarshansky z"l Adar 28, 5781 Nina Moinester z"l Nechama Osna bat Yitzhak Aharon & Doba Av 30, 5781 Rabbi Dr. Jerry Hochbaum z"l Adar II 17, 5782 Mrs. Julia Koschitzky z"l Adar II 18, 5782 Mrs. Leah Meyer z"l Nisan 27, 5782 Mr. Shmuel & Rivka Brandman z"l Tevet 16 5783/ Iyar 8, 5781
|