Making Up Missed Portions of Kri’at HaTorah at Mincha of Shabbat

  • Living The Halachic Process
  • Part 2
  • Rabbi Daniel Mann
Question:
On Shabbat morning, the ba’al koreh omitted two words in the midst of the laining. People initially assumed they had heard incorrectly, but the matter became clear near the end of Musaf. No decision was made about what to do until shul dispersed (the rav was away). At Mincha, we started reading from the point of the error, and the kohen’s aliya ended at its regular place in the new parasha. Were we correct?
Answer:

The Shulchan Aruch,[1] in discussing the case of a ba’al koreh who missed a pasuk, makes the following distinction: If the omission occurred during a weekday kri’at haTorah, then as long as the minimum number of p’sukim were read, we need not go back to read the omitted pasuk. However, on Shabbat morning, we must go back and read the omitted pasuk together with two adjacent p’sukim.[2] If need be, this is done even after the sefer Torah has been returned to the ark. Most poskim rule that we do the same even if just a single word was omitted.[3] The regular birkot haTorah are recited before and after the three p’sukim.[4] However, if we become aware of the mistake right after the aliya where it occurred, then we do not need a separate aliya, rather, the next aliya starts from the place of the mistake and continues into the reading of the next aliya.[5] If the pasuk in question is within three p’sukim of a break in the Torah text (p’tucha or s’tuma), we start reading from the beginning of that section.[6]
Your case is more complicated in that the Shulchan Aruch’s ruling was not employed immediately. The question is whether Mincha is a suitable time to make up the omission, and, if so, how? There is little discussion of this matter amongst the classical poskim, but the following approach emerges from our analysis.
There is a general machloket between Sephardic and Ashkenazic poskim as to whether a community can read the weekly parasha at Mincha of Shabbat when they were unable to do so at Shacharit. Sephardic poskim do not suggest doing this,[7] whereas Ashkenazic poskim do.[8] Therefore, Rav Yosef[9] says that if a Sephardic congregation missed a pasuk and did not act on it prior to the end of the Shabbat morning services, they should read that pasuk at the beginning of kri’at haTorah on the next Shabbat morning along with three adjacent p’sukim. It follows from that approach that Ashkenazim could do the same at Mincha: read the problematic pasuk and perhaps two others, and then skip to the beginning of the next Shabbat’s parasha during the same aliya. This is preferable to reading three p’sukim with berachot from the morning’s parasha independently of the new kri’at haTorah. Since there was a complete set of seven aliyot,[10] some would say a separate reading with berachot is unnecessary[11] and, therefore, it is better to attach the makeup p’sukim to the reading for Mincha.
The fact that you read straight from the place of the mistake until the beginning of the next parasha was, in some ways, halachically preferable (see the Sha’ar Hatziyun cited in n. 5, which may be applicable here). However, it was apparently unnecessary and is not recommended because of tircha d’tzibbura (public inconvenience). B’di’eved, though, your solution was effective for an Ashkenazic community and was reasonable under the circumstances.

** Notes:
[1]
Orach Chayim 137:3

[2]
The requirement found regarding Megillat Esther for the text to be read in order does not apply to kri’at haTorah; see Da’at Torah ad loc.

[3]
Mishna Berura 137:8.

[4]
Magen Avraham 137:6; Taz 137:3; see Massechet Sofrim 21:6.

[5]
Mishna Berura 142:2. The Sha’ar HaTziyun 142:3 explains that it is halachically sufficient to begin the new aliya with the problematic pasuk and perhaps another two, and then to skip to the next aliya. However, it is preferable to read straight.

[6]
Aruch HaShulchan, Orach Chayim 137:4.

[7]
See Yabia Omer IV, Orach Chayim 17.

[8]
Mishna Berura 135:5.

[9]
Yalkut Yosef, Orach Chayim 137:4. The book was written by Rav Yitzchak Yosef, based on the rulings of and reviewed carefully by his father, Rav Ovadya Yosef.

[10]
As opposed to the case in Mishna Berura op. cit.

[11]
See Magen Avraham 137:6.

Public education programs

Torah Study Events for the Public

Throughout the year, Eretz Hemdah hosts days of learning, study evenings, and special events for...

Hilchot Dayanim Program

A comprehensive study program on the laws governing rabbinical judges and Jewish courts, including source...

Friday Beit Midrash

The Friday Beit Midrash has been running for decades and now takes place online via...

Curriculum – Morenu

The program is intended for the many Torah enthusiasts throughout the Jewish world who wish...